Everything about Tasmanian Wolf totally explained
The
Thylacine (
Thylacinus cynocephalus, Latin: wolf-headed pouched dog) was the largest known
carnivorous marsupial of
modern times. Native to
Australia and
New Guinea, it's thought to have become
extinct in the 20th century. It is commonly known as the
Tasmanian Tiger (due to its striped back), the
Tasmanian Wolf,
Striped hyena,
Tasmanian pouched dog, and
colloquially the
Tassie (or Tazzy) Tiger or simply the
Tiger. It was the last extant member of its
genus,
Thylacinus, although a number of related species have been found in the fossil record dating back to the early
Miocene.
The Thylacine became extinct on the
Australian mainland thousands of years before
European settlement of the continent, but survived on the island of
Tasmania along with a number of other
endemic species, including the
Tasmanian Devil. Intensive hunting encouraged by
bounties is generally blamed for its extinction, but other contributory factors may have been disease, the introduction of dogs, and human encroachment into its habitat. Despite being officially classified as extinct, sightings are still reported.
Like the
tigers and
wolves of the Northern Hemisphere, from which it inherited two of its common names, the Thylacine was an
apex predator. As a marsupial, it wasn't related to these
placental mammals, but due to
convergent evolution it displayed the same general form and
adaptations. Its closest living relative is the
Tasmanian Devil.
The Thylacine was one of only two marsupials to have a pouch in both genders. The male Thylacine had a pouch that acted as a protective sheath, protecting the males external organs while running through thick brush.
Evolution
The modern Thylacine first appeared about 4 million years ago. Species of the Thylacinidae family date back to the beginning of the Miocene; since the early 1990s, at least seven fossil species have been uncovered at
Riversleigh, part of
Lawn Hill National Park in north-west
Queensland.
Dickson's Thylacine (
Nimbacinus dicksoni), is the oldest of the seven discovered fossil species, dating back to 23 million years ago. This
thylacinid was much smaller than its more recent relatives. The largest species, the Powerful Thylacine (
Thylacinus potens) which grew to the size of a wolf, was the only species to survive into the late Miocene. In late
Pleistocene and early
Holocene times, the modern Thylacine was widespread (although never numerous) throughout Australia and New Guinea.
An example of
convergent evolution, the Thylacine showed many similarities to the members of the
Canidae (dog) family of the Northern Hemisphere: sharp teeth, powerful jaws,
raised heels and the same general body form. Since the Thylacine filled the same
ecological niche in Australia as the dog family did elsewhere, it developed many of the same features. Despite this, it's unrelated to any of the Northern Hemisphere predators — its closest living relative is the Tasmanian Devil (
Sarcophilus harrisii).
They are easy to tell from a true dog because of the stripes on the back but the skeleton is harder to distinguish. Zoology students at Oxford had to identify 100 zoological specimens as part of the final exam. Word soon got around that, if ever a 'dog' skull was given, it was safe to identify it as Thylacinus on the grounds that anything as obvious as a dog skull had to be a catch. Then one year the examiners, to their credit, double bluffed and put in a real dog skull. The easiest way to tell the difference is by the two prominent holes in the palate bone, which are characteristic of marsupials generally. |
Discovery and taxonomy
The
indigenous peoples of Australia made first contact with the Thylacine. Numerous examples of Thylacine engravings and
rock art have been found dating back to at least 1000 BCE.
Petroglyph images of the Thylacine can be found at the Dampier Rock Art Precinct on the
Burrup Peninsula in
Western Australia. By the time the first explorers arrived, the animal was already rare in Tasmania. Europeans may have encountered it as far back as 1642 when
Abel Tasman first arrived in Tasmania. His shore party reported seeing the footprints of "wild beasts having claws like a "
Tyger".
Marc-Joseph Marion du Fresne, arriving with the
Mascarin in 1772, reported seeing a "tiger cat". Positive identification of the Thylacine as the animal encountered can't be made from this report since the
Tiger Quoll (
Dasyurus maculatus) is similarly described. The first definitive encounter was by French explorers on
13 May 1792, as noted by the naturalist
Jacques Labillardière, in his journal from the expedition led by
D'Entrecasteaux. However, it wasn't until 1805 that
William Paterson, the Lieutenant Governor of Tasmania, sent a detailed description for publication in the
Sydney Gazette and New South Wales Advertiser.
The first detailed scientific description was made by Tasmania's Deputy Surveyor-General,
George Harris in 1808, five years after first settlement of the island. Harris originally placed the Thylacine in the genus
Didelphis, which had been created by
Linnaeus for the American
opossums, describing it as
Didelphis cynocephala, the "dog-headed opossum". Recognition that the Australian marsupials were fundamentally different from the known mammal genera led to the establishment of the modern classification scheme, and in 1796
Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire created the genus
Dasyurus where he placed the Thylacine in 1810. To resolve the mixture of Greek and Latin nomenclature the species name was altered to
cynocephalus. In 1824, it was separated out into its own genus,
Thylacinus, by
Temminck. The common name derives directly from the genus name, originally from the Greek θύλακος (thylakos), meaning pouch or sack.
Description
Descriptions of the Thylacine vary, as evidence is restricted to preserved
joey specimens; fossil records; skins and skeletal remains; black and white photographs and film of the animal in captivity; and accounts from the field.
The Thylacine resembled a large, short-haired dog with a stiff tail which smoothly extended from the body in a similar way to that of a
kangaroo. Many European settlers drew direct comparisons with the
Hyena, due to its unusual stance and general demeanour. One of the stripes extended down the outside of the rear thigh. Its body hair was dense and soft, up to 15 mm (0.6 inches) in length; in juveniles the tip of the tail had a crest. Its rounded, erect ears were about 8 cm (3.1 inches) long and covered with short fur. Colouration varied from light fawn to a dark brown; the belly was cream-coloured.
The mature Thylacine ranged from 100 to 180 cm (39–71 in) long, including a tail of around 50 to 65 cm (19.6–25.5 in). The largest measured specimen was 290 cm (9 ft 6 in) from nose to tail.
The female Thylacine had a pouch with four
teats, but unlike many other marsupials, the pouch opened to the rear of its body. Males had a scrotal pouch, unique amongst the Australian marsupials, into which they could withdraw their
scrotal sac. This capability can be seen in part in
David Fleay's short black-and-white film sequence of a captive Thylacine from 1933. The jaws were muscular and powerful and had 46 teeth. The hindfeet were similar to the forefeet but had four digits rather than five. Their claws were non-retractable.
The Thylacine was noted as having a stiff and somewhat awkward
gait, making it unable to run at high speed. It could also perform a bipedal hop, in a similar fashion to a kangaroo — demonstrated at various times by captive specimens.
Although there are no recordings of Thylacine vocalisations, observers of the animal in the wild and in captivity noted that it would growl and hiss when agitated, often accompanied by a threat-yawn. During hunting it would emit a series of rapidly repeated guttural
cough-like barks (described as "yip-yap", "cay-yip" or "hop-hop-hop"), probably for communication between the family pack members. It also had a long whining cry, probably for identification at distance, and a low snuffling noise used for communication between family members.
Ecology and behaviour
Little is known about the behaviour or habitat of the Thylacine. A few observations were made of the animal in captivity, but only limited, anecdotal evidence exists of the animal's behaviour in the wild. Most observations were made during the day whereas the Thylacine was naturally nocturnal. Those observations made in the 20th century may have been atypical as they were of a species already under the stresses that would soon lead to its extinction. Some behavioural characteristics have been extrapolated from the behaviour of its close relative, the Tasmanian Devil.
The Thylacine probably preferred the dry
eucalyptus forests, wetlands, and grasslands in
continental Australia.
In Tasmania it preferred the woodlands of the midlands and coastal
heath, which eventually became the primary focus of British settlers seeking grazing properties for their
livestock. The animal had a typical home range of between 40 and 80 km².
The Thylacine was a
nocturnal and
crepuscular hunter, spending the daylight hours in small caves or hollow tree trunks in a nest of twigs, bark or fern fronds. It tended to retreat to the hills and forest for shelter during the day and hunted in the open heath at night. Early observers noted that the animal was typically shy and secretive, with awareness to the presence of humans and generally avoiding contact, though it occasionally showed inquisitive traits. Thylacines only once bred successfully in captivity, in
Melbourne Zoo in 1899. Their life expectancy in the wild is estimated to have been 5 to 7 years, although captive specimens survived up to 9 years. Both
Dingos and foxes have been noted to hunt the
emu on the mainland. Throughout the 20th century, the Thylacine was often characterised as primarily a blood drinker, but little reference is now made to this trait; its popularity seems to have originated from a single second-hand account.
European settlers believed the Thylacine to have preyed upon farmers'
sheep and
poultry. In captivity, Thylacines were fed a wide variety of foods, including dead rabbits and wallabies as well as beef, mutton, and horseflesh and occasionally poultry.
Extinction
The Thylacine is likely to have become extinct in mainland Australia about 2,000 years ago (possibly earlier in New Guinea). The extinction is attributed to competition from indigenous humans and
invasive Dingos. Doubts exist over the impact of the Dingo, however, as the two species wouldn't have been in direct competition with one another. The Dingo is a primarily
diurnal predator, while it's thought the Thylacine hunted mostly at night. In addition, the Thylacine had a more powerful build, which would have given it an advantage in one-to-one encounters.
Rock paintings from the
Kakadu National Park clearly show that Thylacines were hunted by early humans, and it's believed that Dingos and Thylacines may have competed for the same prey. Their environments clearly overlapped: Thylacine sub-fossil remains have been discovered in proximity to those of Dingos. The adoption of the Dingo as a hunting companion by the indigenous peoples would have put the Thylacine under increased pressure.]]
Although long extinct on the Australian mainland by the time the European settlers arrived, the Thylacine survived into the 1930s in
Tasmania. At the time of the first settlement, the heaviest distributions were in the north-east, north-west and north-midland regions. erosion of habitat, the concurrent extinction of prey species, and a
distemper-like disease that also affected many captive specimens at the time.
Whatever the reason, the animal had become extremely rare in the wild by the late 1920s. There were several efforts to save the species from extinction. Records of the
Wilsons Promontory management committee dating to 1908 included recommendations for Thylacines to be reintroduced to several suitable locations on the Victorian mainland. In 1928, the Tasmanian Advisory Committee for Native Fauna had recommended a reserve to protect any remaining Thylacines, with potential sites of suitable habitat including the
Arthur-
Pieman area of western Tasmania.
The last known wild Thylacine to be killed was shot in 1930, by farmer Wilf Batty in
Mawbanna, in the North East of the state. The animal (believed to be a male) had been seen round Batty's hen houses for several weeks.
"Benjamin" and searches
The last captive Thylacine, later referred to as "Benjamin" (although its sex has never been confirmed) was captured in 1933 and sent to the
Hobart Zoo where it lived for three years. Frank Darby, who claimed to have been a keeper at Hobart Zoo, suggested "Benjamin" as having been the animal's pet name in a newspaper article of May 1968. However, no documentation exists to suggest that it ever had a pet name, and Alison Reid (the
de facto curator at the zoo at the time) and Michael Sharland (the then publicist for the zoo) denied that Frank Darby had ever worked at the zoo or that the name
Benjamin was ever used for the animal. Darby also appears to be the source for the claim that the last Thylacine was a male; photographic evidence suggests it was female. This Thylacine died on
7 September 1936. It is believed to have died as the result of neglect — locked out of its sheltered sleeping quarters, it was exposed to a rare occurrence of extreme Tasmanian weather: baking heat during the day and freezing temperatures at night.
This Thylacine features in the last known motion picture footage of a living specimen: 62 seconds of black-and-white footage showing it pacing backwards and forwards in its enclosure, taken in 1933 by naturalist
David Fleay.
National Threatened Species Day is held annually on
7 September in Australia, to commemorate the death of the last officially recorded Thylacine. It has been held since 1996.
Although there had been a conservation movement pressing for the Thylacine's protection since 1901, driven in part by the increasing difficulty in obtaining specimens for overseas collections, political difficulties prevented any form of protection coming into force until 1936. Official protection of the species by the Tasmanian government was introduced on
10 July 1936, 59 days before the last known specimen died in captivity.
The results of subsequent searches indicated a strong possibility of the survival of the species in Tasmania into the 1960s. Searches by
Dr. Eric Guiler and David Fleay in the north-west of Tasmania found footprints and scats that may have belonged to the animal, heard vocalisations matching the description of those of the Thylacine, and collected anecdotal evidence from people reported to have sighted the animal. Despite the searches, no conclusive evidence was found to point to its continued existence in the wild.
Unconfirmed sightings
Although the Thylacine is formally extinct, many people believe the animal still exists. Sightings are regularly claimed in Tasmania, other parts of
Australia and even in the
Western New Guinea area of
Indonesia, near the
Papua New Guinea border. The Australian Rare Fauna Research Association reports having 3,800 sightings on file from mainland Australia since the 1936 extinction date, while the Mystery Animal Research Centre of Australia recorded 138 up to 1998, and the Department of Conservation and Land Management recorded 65 in Western Australia over the same period. On the mainland, sightings are most frequently reported in Southern Victoria.
Sightings of the
Red Fox (first introduced as early as 1864 and again in around 2000) in Tasmania are taken very seriously, despite only minimal evidence of the presence of the species on the island. While the Fox Free Tasmanian Taskforce receives government funding, there's no longer any funding for searches for the Thylacine. The difficulty of locating foxes in the Tasmanian wilderness points to some chance of the Thylacine's survival away from human contact. In January 1995, a Parks and Wildlife officer reported observing a Thylacine in the
Pyengana region of North Eastern Tasmania in the early hours of the morning. Later searches revealed no trace of the animal. In 1997, it was reported that locals and missionaries near
Mount Carstensz in
Western New Guinea, had sighted Thylacines. The locals had apparently known about them for many years but hadn't made an official report.
In February 2005 Klaus Emmerichs, a
German tourist, claimed to have taken
digital photographs of a Thylacine he saw near the
Lake St Clair National Park, but the authenticity of the photographs hasn't been established.
The photos were not published until April 2006, fourteen months after the sighting. The photographs, which showed only the back of the animal, were said, by those who studied them, to be inconclusive as evidence of the Thylacine's continued existence.
Rewards
In 1983,
Ted Turner offered a $100,000 reward for proof of the continued existence of the Thylacine.
However, a letter sent in response to an inquiry by a Thylacine-searcher, Murray McAllister, in 2000 indicated that the reward had been withdrawn. In March 2005, Australian news magazine
The Bulletin, as part of its 125th anniversary celebrations, offered a $1.25 million reward for the safe capture of a live Thylacine. When the offer closed at the end of June 2005 no one had produced any evidence of the animal's existence. An offer of $1.75 million has subsequently been offered by a Tasmanian tour operator, Stewart Malcolm. The goal was to use
genetic material from specimens taken and preserved in the early 20th century to
clone new individuals and restore the species from extinction. Several serious microbiologists have dismissed the project as a PR stunt and its chief proponent, Professor Mike Archer, received a 2002 nomination for the Australian Skeptics
Bent Spoon Award for "the perpetrator of the most preposterous piece of paranormal or pseudo-scientific piffle".
In late 2002 the researchers had some success as they were able to extract replicable
DNA from the specimens. On
15 February 2005, the museum announced that it was stopping the project after tests showed the DNA retrieved from the specimens had been too badly degraded to be usable. In May 2005, Professor Michael Archer, the
University of New South Wales Dean of Science, former director of the
Australian Museum and evolutionary biologist, announced that the project was being restarted by a group of interested universities and a research institute.
The
International Thylacine Specimen Database (ITSD) was completed in April 2005 and is the culmination of a four-year research project to catalog and digitally photograph, if possible, all known surviving Thylacine specimen material held within museum, university and private collections. The master records are held by the
Zoological Society of London.
Cultural references
The Thylacine has been used extensively as a symbol of Tasmania. The animal is featured on the official
Tasmanian Coat of Arms. It is used in the official logos of
Tourism Tasmania and the
Launceston City Council. Since 1998, it has been prominently displayed on
Tasmanian vehicle license plates.
The plight of the Thylacine was featured in a campaign for
The Wilderness Society entitled
We used to hunt Thylacines. The animal is featured on
Cascade Brewery beer products and in their television advertisements. In video games,
Ty the Tasmanian Tiger is the star of his own trilogy. In the early 1990s' Cartoon TV show "
Taz-Mania" the character, Wendell T. Wolf, was supposedly the last surviving Tasmanian wolf.
Tiger Tale is a children's book based on an Aboriginal myth about how the Thylacine got its stripes. The Thylacine is the mascot for
Tasmanian Tigers state cricket team and has also appeared in postage stamps from Australia,
Equatorial Guinea, and
Micronesia.
See also
Further Information
Get more info on 'Tasmanian Wolf'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://thylacine.totallyexplained.com">Thylacine Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |